AAM Units database released

Discuss general AAM topics here

Moderator: FieldMarshall Ober

User avatar
Pletch
Member
Member
Posts: 997
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 4:03 am
Location: Ohio, USA

Re: AAM Units database released

Unread post by Pletch » Sat Jun 09, 2012 7:20 pm

Sorry I was just pointing out that you were indeed correct and the revised card for the ZIS-2 of Set II is indeed 1943. I don't make the updates, but rest assured the change will be taken care of.
"Grammar is very important the the Nazi Party." - Grammar Nazis
:lol:

User avatar
FieldMarshall Ober
Founder
Founder
Posts: 5092
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 7:37 pm
Location: OK, Its late july and summer is over in Canada....it was 3 days this year!
Contact:

Re: AAM Units database released

Unread post by FieldMarshall Ober » Sat Jun 09, 2012 7:47 pm

Pletch wrote:Sorry I was just pointing out that you were indeed correct and the revised card for the ZIS-2 of Set II is indeed 1943. I don't make the updates, but rest assured the change will be taken care of.
Fixed and thanks for the heads-up. :D
"Maybe there are 5,000, maybe 10,000 Nazi bastards in their concrete foxholes before the Third Army. Now if Ike stops holding Monty's hand and gives me some supplies, I'll go through the Siegfried Line like %*$# through a goose."
~Gen. G.S. Patton

Image

User avatar
Ace of Aces
Mod
Mod
Posts: 1230
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 9:24 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: AAM Units database released

Unread post by Ace of Aces » Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:31 am

Formatting (size, maybe font and/or style) for Counter Offensive F4U Corsair different than all other cards I have come across.

Disclaimer: I am not going out of my way to find issues, just pointing out things I notice as I set these up to print in sheets.

Edit: Reserves version also has same formatting.
Last edited by Ace of Aces on Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[align=center]ImageImage - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ImageImage[/align]

SgtFury
Member
Member
Posts: 73
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 7:14 pm

Re: AAM Units database released

Unread post by SgtFury » Tue Jun 12, 2012 3:26 pm

ZIS-2 of Set II has been corrected to 1943, but picture is now missing.

@ Ace of Aces - Good catch on the start year error!

User avatar
Ace of Aces
Mod
Mod
Posts: 1230
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 9:24 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: AAM Units database released

Unread post by Ace of Aces » Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:16 am

Corsair Bombs SA needs minor correction (Reserves & CO).

"Once per game, instead of rolling this unit's attack against an enemy Soldier or Vehicle in the same hex, you can declare you are using bombs. If you do, roll 12 attack dice against enemy that unit if it's a Soldier or 8 attack dice if it's a vehicle."

enemy needs to be removed.
[align=center]ImageImage - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ImageImage[/align]

User avatar
Ace of Aces
Mod
Mod
Posts: 1230
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 9:24 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: AAM Units database released

Unread post by Ace of Aces » Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:39 pm

Wagons should be wagens (with a "v" :wink:)

Kubelwagon to Kubelwagen for NA & EW
Panzerspahwagon to Panzerspahwagen
[align=center]ImageImage - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ImageImage[/align]

Entek
Member
Member
Posts: 454
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:16 am
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, CA

Re: AAM Units database released

Unread post by Entek » Fri Jun 29, 2012 10:19 pm

The I-16 "Ishak" has Anti-Air 2x instead of having Aircraft.

Also the 76.2mm Model 1942 is listed as having a start date of 1941. I guess it's another prototype. :)
Image
Thank you Rebel!

User avatar
Pletch
Member
Member
Posts: 997
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 4:03 am
Location: Ohio, USA

Re: AAM Units database released

Unread post by Pletch » Sat Jun 30, 2012 3:26 am

The 76.2mm Model 1942 is correct as a 1941 under the revised cards. Yes it's weird. The history behind it is due to the fact the "1942" model hit the battlefields late in 1941. If I remember correctly, it was December 1941. AAMs convention is to use the year of first combat. In this case it works out strangely.

In a similar vein the Tiger I hit the battlefield in December of 1942. So while "technically" a 1942 unit, it's really more of a 1943 unit.
"Grammar is very important the the Nazi Party." - Grammar Nazis
:lol:

Entek
Member
Member
Posts: 454
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:16 am
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, CA

Re: AAM Units database released

Unread post by Entek » Sat Jun 30, 2012 4:07 am

Guess I should have checked the card. Thank you for the history!
Image
Thank you Rebel!

User avatar
Pletch
Member
Member
Posts: 997
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 4:03 am
Location: Ohio, USA

Re: AAM Units database released

Unread post by Pletch » Sat Jun 30, 2012 6:39 pm

Entek wrote:Guess I should have checked the card. Thank you for the history!
I only know because I thought it was weird too and looked it up. :D
"Grammar is very important the the Nazi Party." - Grammar Nazis
:lol:

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests